The pottery pay dispute in 1914

Extract from a formal pay claim submitted by pottery workers to Edward Johns & Co. at Armitage, dated 11 February 1914 and stamped received, proposing revised rates of pay from 25 March 1914.

In 1914 the pottery industry followed the same procedure for pay discussions that had been developed in the 1890s and it had a very set annual pay round – every company in the industry followed exactly the same routine. Prices that were to be paid to the potters for the following 12 months were set on the 25th March and any change in prices, from either employers or potters, had to be submitted by 11th February – six weeks before the price setting day.

The employers in the sanitary ware market were represented by the British Pottery Manufacturers Federation (BPMF) who were initially set up to agree prices that they would charge their customers. It also looked to share information on wages and collect information about their foreign competitors.

The potters i.e. pressers and casters, were represented by the National Amalgamated Society of Male and Female Pottery Workers, or Potter’s Union for short. It had been formed five years or so earlier by amalgamation of a host of smaller unions such as the Amalgamated Society of Hollow-Ware Pressers.

There had been no change in prices in the sanitary ware market for 24 months and both sides wanted a change – in opposite directions of course.

The National Amalgamated Society of Male and Female Pottery Workers, aka the potters union, had been pushing hard to recruit members with considerable success. Their latest recruit was John Thomas Peate who had worked at the pottery since the 1860s and he was a real feather in their cap. Not only had he been a member of Armitage Parish Council since its inception in 1894 but he had been its Chairman, the Parish Overseer and he was a leading light in the Congregational Chapel. Its numbers had now grown to over 50 and it also included plenty of the newcomers from the Potteries e.g. Robert Briggs and Elijah Brindley. Each union member had to sign the demand as can be seen below. The numbers associated with each individual are their membership number and the page covering numbers 1 – 49 is missing from the records although it may be that there were no longer members for those numbers so it might never have been included. The union put forward increases to the price of all products which was essentially 10% across the board.

irst page of handwritten signatures of Armitage pottery workers supporting the formal pay claim submitted to Edward Johns & Co. in February 1914.
Continuation of the handwritten list of pottery workers' signatures supporting the 1914 pay claim at Edward Johns & Co., Armitage.
Final section of the February 1914 pottery pay claim, showing the formal notice to Edward Johns & Co. and further handwritten signatures of workers supporting the proposed changes to pay rates.

The company meanwhile proposed a reduction of 1s 3d in the price paid for each item. When Edmund Corn was interviewed by the Lichfield Mercury he stated that the reason that he (and other manufacturers) had proposed such drastic reductions was completely down to German competition. Sanitary ware manufacturers all seem to have been suffering from the same competition whilst general earthenware manufacturers were largely unaffected.

A joint committee of masters and men was set up – Edmund Corn as Chairman with three representatives from manufacturers and three from the potters. Meetings were held at the North Stafford Hotel in Stoke throughout March and into April and in mid-April a joint report was presented to the potters. The net result was no change in prices, but neither was the matter referred to arbitration by either side.

Six months later Great Britain was at war with the Germans. Number 96 in the photos above was D Spickermann (Dietrich) who was a German caster who had moved to the village to help train the casters. In 1908 he had married Annie Waltho with whom he had two children. In November 1914 his daughter died and was buried in Armitage graveyard and the register shows her address as 7 Ricardia Terrace. Dietrich is not found in any more records after signing the pay demand and he presumably had to return to Germany. Annie, many years later, is shown as a widow so it is likely that he died in the war.

The list contains six others who also died in the war

  • Reginald George Clarke
  • James Henry Clarke
  • James Hiley
  • Edwin Salt Hill
  • Arthur Kitson
  • Albert Victor Steele

Similar Posts

  • Gateway to the Past: The Story Behind Handsacre’s Historic Gateposts

    A pair of old cast-iron gateposts in Handsacre leads to the story of R. J. Harris & Son, one of Rugeley’s best-known engineering and ironmongery firms. Beginning with an overlooked detail in a historic photograph, this article traces the growth of a successful family business whose products ranged from agricultural machinery to garden rollers, leaving a lasting mark on the local landscape and economy.

  • Pit ponies

    At just thirteen years old, Jack Smith left school to become a pit pony driver at Brick Kiln Colliery near Brereton. Through his story, this article recreates the demanding daily routine of boys who worked underground, the vital role played by the pit ponies and the harsh realities of coal mining in the early twentieth century. It ends with the tragic accident that claimed Jack’s life when he was only seventeen.

  • Inside Hawkesyard in 1839

    What was life like inside Hawkesyard in 1839? Using a remarkably detailed sale catalogue, this article reconstructs the house room by room, revealing elegant reception rooms, servants’ quarters, libraries, kitchens and private apartments while exploring how Thomas Henry Lister lived between the worlds of fashionable society and Victorian public service.

  • Non-conformism

    The rise of nonconformism in Armitage and Handsacre mirrored a wider national movement, reshaping both religious practices and social structures. Rooted in dissent from the Anglican Church, these groups sought greater spiritual independence and democratic governance. Methodism, for example, emphasized personal faith and social outreach, while the Methodist New Connexion and Primitive Methodists grew from…

  • Never goo to weddin’s

    Never Goo to Weddins is a humorous Staffordshire dialect poem, but it also offers a fascinating glimpse into nineteenth-century village life. Through local speech, colourful characters and a wedding that descends into chaos, the poem captures the humour, customs and language of the Black Country and Staffordshire. This article explores its origins, meaning and enduring appeal as a piece of regional social history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *