Problems for a Rector

The English Reformation took place in the 16th C when the Church of England broke away from the authority of the Pope and the Catholic Church. This was primarily in response to Pope Clement VII refusing the annulment of Henry VIII’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon.

It wasn’t simply a replacement of the head of the church though as there was a need to establish the doctrines and practices of the new Church both in relation to the Roman Catholic Church and to the new Protestant movements in continental Europe. Both conservative and reforming clergy tried to steer the church’s direction, the former as simply Catholicism without the Pope and the latter as Protestant.

The new Church became heavily influenced by Calvinists and Lutherans during the reign of Henry’s son, Edward VI, but Queen Mary turned the country back to Catholicism. She only reigned for five years and Elizabeth I promptly turned it Protestant again. During Elizabeth’s reign the church set out the Thirty-nine Articles of Religion defining the doctrines and practices which formed part of the Book of Common Prayer which all clergy would have to follow.

After the execution of Charles I in 1649 the country and the parish became increasingly protestant and Puritan. In 1654 Nathaniel Mansfield M.A. was appointed Rector of the parish of Armitage. He was a fervent and enthusiastic speaker and very passionate about his religion. He believed wholeheartedly in the bible and, reportedly, had quite a temper. His moral and religious earnestness and his evangelical approach dovetailed nicely with the prevailing national Puritanism.

Charles II was crowned on St. George’s Day 1661 and the conservative clergy were able to restore the Book of Common Prayer and persuade the King that strong measures should be taken to protect the monarchy and the church. In May 1662 the Act of Uniformity was passed.

The Act prescribed, amongst other things, that every minister of a church must make a public declaration of “assent and consent” to everything in the Book of Common Prayer and to the Sacraments and other rites and ceremonies of the Church of England. All who objected or refused to make this declaration were to be deprived of their livings. Every minister was also to take an oath of passive obedience to everything in the Act and to exactly conform to the liturgy of the Church. If he did not conform to this i.e. become a non-conformer and continued preaching, he would be imprisoned for three months. Even to be a teacher or private tutor required a licence from a bishop or archbishop under penalty of three months imprisonment and a fine of £5 for every single offence. Finally, no man could be a minister unless he had been formally ordained by a bishop – the penalty against that was £100.

The day of enactment chosen was St. Bartholomew’s Day (August 24th) which was the day that tithes and rents were due. If ministers did not conform, they would lose these payments, which were made quarterly in arrears, thus impoverishing most of them. If they lived in a rectory, they would also lose their house.

Despite the prospect of losing both his house and his livelihood, Nathaniel Mansfield decided that he could not conform and be true to his religious beliefs and he was accordingly ejected from his position as Rector of Armitage. About 2000 Ministers in all refused to conform – about 20% of the total.

Nathaniel became a Presbyterian and preached secretly to his flock of Non-Conformists in the area before moving to Wolverhampton and Walsall.

Similar Posts

  • The 1921 census is here

    The release of the 1921 Census provides the most detailed snapshot of Armitage and Handsacre available until the 1951 Census is opened in 2052. Compiled just after the bitter miners’ strike of 1921, it records every household, workplace and occupation, revealing how industrial unrest affected local families. From coal miners and pottery workers to priests, visitors and schoolchildren, it offers an extraordinary glimpse of parish life a century ago—and the complete transcription is now available on this website.

  • St. John the Baptist Church

    As St. John the Baptist church was largely rebuilt in the 1840s, and little documentary evidence survives from before that time, it is necessary to turn to alternative sources to reconstruct the form and chronology of the earlier building. Stebbing Shaw, writing in the 1790s, provides a detailed and informative description of the church, including…

  • The Long Shadow of the Great War

    The First World War did not end for many survivors when they returned home. Through the lives of Percy Collop, Philip Bartlett, William Pedley and William Waltho, this article explores the lasting physical and emotional impact of the conflict on men from Armitage and Handsacre. Drawing on military records, newspapers and family histories, it reveals how service continued to shape their lives long after the guns fell silent in 1918.

  • When Hannah Waltho Died

    The death of Hannah Waltho in 1791 left her family dependent on parish support, but the story did not end there. Overseers paid for her funeral, investigated her husband’s remarriage and eventually apprenticed William and Jane to begin new lives. Their story reveals both the hardships and the opportunities created by the Old Poor Law.

  • The pre-fabs

    Armitage’s prefabs were intended to last only a few years, yet for many families they became cherished homes for decades. This article traces their origins in Britain’s post-war housing crisis, the heated local debates over their allocation, and the remarkable community that grew around them. It also reveals how the estate became the setting for an innovative stock allotment scheme that helped families cope with rationing and food shortages.

  • The Coronation Carnival of 1937

    How did Armitage and Handsacre celebrate the Coronation of George VI in 1937? Drawing on committee records, newspaper reports and surviving invoices, this article recreates a remarkable day of carnival processions, fancy dress, races, teas, torchlight parades and a giant bonfire. It also reveals the extraordinary planning behind the celebrations and offers a vivid glimpse of community life in the parish before the Second World War.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *